everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different format than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about the best mascara primer or eyelash curler to pair with this mascara? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Caviar Volume Panoramic Mascara - Glossy Black by Laura Mercier. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
|Easy to Apply - how easy to apply did you find this product?|
|Removal - was this product easy to remove?|
|Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product?|
|Flakiness - how flakey is this product?|
|Smudginess - how smudgy is this product?|
|Clumpiness - how clumpy is this product?|
|Curling - how effective is this product for curling?|
|Lengthening - how effective is this product for lengthening?|
|Volumizing - how effective is this product for volumizing?|
|Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall?|
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Considering the easy to apply category the rating of four suggests users & critics evaluating "how easy to apply did you find this product?" usually indicate applies itself. Feedback for the long-wearing category the current rating of four suggests reviewers replies to "how long-wearing is this product?" generally indicate stays all day. In the curling category a rating of zero is a sign that responses to "how effective is this product for curling?" heavily indicate ineffective. Reviewing the lengthening category an average of zero indicates when asked "how effective is this product for lengthening?" primarily favor ineffective. On the volumizing category the current zero suggests considering the question "how effective is this product for volumizing?" frequently lean ineffective.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for mascara is volumizing. volumizing ranges from ineffective to extremely volumizing. While a high volumizing rating might be the desired criteria for you, lengthening or curling might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for volumizing without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .