everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different format or finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about the best blush brush to use with this blush? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Cliniquefit Lip + Cheek Flush - Pink In Motion by Clinique. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
|Easy to Apply - how easy to apply did you find this product?|
|Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product?|
|Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?|
|Pigmentation - how pigmented is this product?|
|Natural Looking - how natural looking is this product|
|Blendability - how blendable is this product?|
|Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product?|
|Glow - how much glow does this product provide?|
|Finely Milled - how finely milled is this product?|
|Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall?|
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Considering the long-wearing category the rating of five is a sign that evaluating "how long-wearing is this product?" heavily suggest stays all day. On the colour category the current six suggests responses to "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" frequently lean true to colour. Looking at review rankings for the pigmentation category a rating of four suggests users & critics considering the question "how pigmented is this product?" mainly suggest vibrant. In the natural looking category an average of four indicates when asked "how natural looking is this product" usually indicate me only better.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for blush is glow. glow ranges from matte to frost. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while frost might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for glow without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .