everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different format or coverage than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about which primer or foundation brush works well with this foundation? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Diorskin Forever - 020 Light Beige by Dior. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
Easy to Apply - how easy to apply did you find this product? |
Application - how did this product apply? |
Formula Thickness - how thick is the formula for this product? |
Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
Lightweight - how lightweight does this product feel? |
Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
Colour - did this product work for your skin tone? |
Natural Looking - how natural looking is this product |
Blendability - how blendable is this product? |
Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
Cakey-ness - how cakey is this product? |
Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: On the formula thickness category the current rating of two indicates replies to "how thick is the formula for this product?" mildly suggest thin. Feedback for the moisturizing category a rating of four suggests reviewers evaluating "how moisturizing is this product?" usually suggest hydrating. Considering feedback for the colour category an average total of five suggests responses to "did this product work for your skin tone?" mostly responded worked for my skin tone. Looking at review rankings for the natural looking category the rating of four is a sign that in response to the "how natural looking is this product" usually favor me only better. Considering the blendability category the current four suggests users & critics considering the question "how blendable is this product?" generally suggest blends easily.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for foundation is formula thickness. formula thickness ranges from thin to thick. Thin might be a desired quality for you, while thick might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for formula thickness without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .