we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Effacernes Waterproof Protective Undereye Concealer - Medium Bisque by Lancôme. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
Easy to Apply - how easy to apply did you find this product? |
Application - how did this product apply? |
Formula Thickness - how thick is the formula for this product? |
Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
Lightweight - how lightweight does this product feel? |
Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
Colour - did this product work for your skin tone? |
Natural Looking - how natural looking is this product |
Blendability - how blendable is this product? |
Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
Crease-Resistant - how crease-resistance is this product? |
Cakey-ness - how cakey is this product? |
Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Reviewing the easy to apply category the current four suggests evaluating "how easy to apply did you find this product?" tended towards applies itself. On the application category the current rating of five is a sign that responses to "how did this product apply?" heavily suggest even. Considering the formula thickness category a rating of zero suggests reviewers considering the question "how thick is the formula for this product?" frequently indicate thin. Feedback for the long-wearing category the rating of five indicates replies to "how long-wearing is this product?" frequently lean stays all day. Looking at review rankings for the colour category an average of one suggests users & critics when asked "did this product work for your skin tone?" usually suggest did not work.