your collection looks empty, select have, wishlist, or had from anything on the site to get started:
Marc Jacobs Enamored Hydrating Lip Gloss Stick - Sugar Sugar
bg is user-supported. as an amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
add your swatch or look

getting your skin on track? try our skin diary!

everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about how long lasting this lipgloss, lip plumper or lip stain is? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.

we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Enamored Hydrating Lip Gloss Stick - Sugar Sugar by Marc Jacobs. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.

 

 

8.0
8.0 critics
- . - users
average rating based on
less then fifty reviews
most would repurchase

Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Looking at review rankings for the formula thickness category an average of five suggests users & critics when asked "how thick is the formula for this product?" usually suggest thick. On the moisturizing category the current rating of four is a sign that replies to "how moisturizing is this product?" mainly favor hydrating. Feedback for the colour category an average total of six indicates in response to the "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" primarily lean true to colour. Reviewing the pigmentation category a rating of five suggests reviewers evaluating "how pigmented is this product?" mostly responded opaque. Considering feedback for the luster category the current five suggests considering the question "how lustrous is this product?" generally suggest glossy.


at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.

without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.

as an example, one rating criteria for lipgloss is stickiness. stickiness ranges from very sticky to not sticky. Very sticky might be a desired quality for you, while not sticky might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.

an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for stickiness without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.

we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .

join the community

critic reviews

potentially helpful related reviews
not for this shade
:

not a review but perhaps helpful - here is a description from the source: Parabens Sulfates Phthalates

other popular suggestions: Le Marc Frost Lip Creme 508 Detox Eye-Conic Eyeshadow Palette Socialeyes