your collection looks empty, select have, wishlist, or had from anything on the site to get started:
everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different format or coverage than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about which primer or foundation brush works well with this foundation? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Flawless Fusion Ultra-Longwear - 3N2 Honey by Laura Mercier. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
no dupes in sight,
identify the first
swatches for Laura Mercier 3N2 Honey
no swatches in sight,
provide the first applied swatch photo
less then fifty reviews
| Easy to Apply - how easy to apply did you find this product? |
| Application - how did this product apply? |
| Formula Thickness - how thick is the formula for this product? |
| Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
| Lightweight - how lightweight does this product feel? |
| Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
| Colour - did this product work for your skin tone? |
| Natural Looking - how natural looking is this product |
| Blendability - how blendable is this product? |
| Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
| Cakey-ness - how cakey is this product? |
| Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Reviewing the easy to apply category the current four suggests users & critics evaluating "how easy to apply did you find this product?" mainly suggest applies itself. Looking at review rankings for the application category the rating of four suggests replies to "how did this product apply?" usually indicate even. Considering the formula thickness category an average of four is a sign that when asked "how thick is the formula for this product?" somewhat indicate thick. Feedback for the lightweight category the current rating of four indicates responses to "how lightweight does this product feel?" usually suggest weightless. On the long-wearing category an average total of five suggests reviewers considering the question "how long-wearing is this product?" usually lean stays all day.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for foundation is formula thickness. formula thickness ranges from thin to thick. Thin might be a desired quality for you, while thick might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for formula thickness without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
potentially helpful related reviews
not for this shade
:
Rachelit looks really flawless, it doesn't feel like I have a lot of stuff on my face watch the full review
not a review but perhaps helpful - here is a description from the source: What it is: A long-wearing foundation that provides flawless full coverage and 15 hours of wear infused into one weightless formula. Who it's for: Anyone any skin type, especially normal-to-oily, who wants buildable medium-to-full coverage and a matte finish. What it does: This high performance-wear foundation is sweat, humidity, water- and transfer-resistant with color that stays true all day and won't oxidize. Coated pigments glide on to create beautiful coverage that evens out skin tone and minimizes the look of pores and imperfections. It controls oil immediately and throughout the day. The matte finish is never dull, flat or cakey. Skin-fusion technology provides ultimate long wear with comfortable, buildable ease. How to use: Dispense a small amount onto the back of your hand and apply to your face with a makeup sponge or your fingertips. For best results, use after your foundation primer. Pro tips: For the most flawless, natural look, Laura says it's key to avoid over-applying foundation to the middle of the face, where too much formula can accentuate lines and other imperfections. With liquid, creme or powder, she recommends starting at the outer portion of the face and working inward toward the nose. Focus on one area at one time and be sure to blend well. Avoid excess application around the eyes or the contours of the face.
other popular suggestions: Caviar Stick Eye Colour Sienna Velour Extreme Matte Lipstick Soirée