we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Hollywood Lips - Dangerous Liaison by Charlotte Tilbury. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
Application - how did this product apply? |
Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
Pigmentation - how pigmented is this product? |
Luster - how lustrous is this product? |
Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
Feathering - how feathering is this product? |
Texture - how is the texture of this product? |
Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Considering feedback for the application category the rating of five indicates evaluating "how did this product apply?" lean strongly towards glides. Looking at review rankings for the moisturizing category a rating of two suggests users & critics responses to "how moisturizing is this product?" somewhat suggest drying. Reviewing the long-wearing category an average total of two suggests in response to the "how long-wearing is this product?" somewhat favor disappears quickly. In the colour category the current five is a sign that replies to "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" tended towards true to colour. On the pigmentation category an average of four suggests reviewers when asked "how pigmented is this product?" are lukewarm towards opaque.