your collection looks empty, select have, wishlist, or had from anything on the site to get started:
everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different format or finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about the best cheek brush to use with this highlighter (or coutouring makeup)? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Hyper Real Foundation - Gold FX by MAC. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
Gold FX Hyper Real Foundation dupes
no dupes in sight,
identify the first
no swatches in sight,
provide the first applied swatch photo
Reviews for MAC Hyper Real Foundation Gold FX
less then fifty reviews
most would repurchase
| Easy to Apply - how easy to apply did you find this product? |
| Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
| Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
| Natural Looking - how natural looking is this product |
| Blendability - how blendable is this product? |
| Glow - how much glow does this product provide? |
| Finely Milled - how finely milled is this product? |
| Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Considering feedback for the easy to apply category the rating of four indicates evaluating "how easy to apply did you find this product?" generally favor applies itself. Considering the long-wearing category the current rating of four suggests users & critics replies to "how long-wearing is this product?" mainly favor stays all day. In the colour category an average of five suggests when asked "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" usually suggest true to colour. Looking at review rankings for the natural looking category an average total of four suggests reviewers in response to the "how natural looking is this product" usually indicate me only better. On the blendability category a rating of four is a sign that responses to "how blendable is this product?" mainly suggest blends easily.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for highlighting & contouring is glow. glow ranges from matte to frost. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while frost might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for glow without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
not a review but perhaps helpful - here is a description from the source: What it is: A weightless liquid highlighter that imparts a dreamy glow with a refined high-pearl finish. Who it's for: Anyone with any skin type who wants sheer-to-medium coverage and a satin sheen finish. What it does: It leaves your complexion with a look that is immediately brighter, dimensional and healthy-looking. It goes on smooth and silky and adheres to skin for illumination that lasts. Long-wearing for up to eight hours, the noncaking and nonstreaking foundation can be layered underneath foundation for an alluring allover radiance or applied over foundation as a highlighter for intense pearlescent illumination. How to use: For allover radiance, apply a thin layer to the entire face underneath foundation. For an intense glow, apply over foundation directly to the cheeks and high points of the face and lightly blend.
other popular suggestions: Lustre Lipstick Good Form Powder Kiss Lipstick Velvet Punch