166 Walk The Lime Juicy Shaker Pigment Infused Bi-Phase Lip Oil
lip gloss, plumper, & stain
your collection looks empty, select have, wishlist, or had from anything on the site to get started:
everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about how long lasting this lipgloss, lip plumper or lip stain is? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Juicy Shaker Pigment Infused Bi-Phase Lip Oil - 166 Walk The Lime by Lancôme. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
swatches for Lancôme 166 Walk The Lime
no swatches in sight,
provide the first applied swatch photo
less then fifty reviews
| Formula Thickness - how thick is the formula for this product? |
| Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
| Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
| Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
| Pigmentation - how pigmented is this product? |
| Luster - how lustrous is this product? |
| Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
| Stickiness - how sticky is this product? |
| Feathering - how feathering is this product? |
| Texture - how is the texture of this product? |
| Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Feedback for the formula thickness category the current zero is a sign that responses to "how thick is the formula for this product?" heavily favor thin. In the moisturizing category the rating of four suggests in response to the "how moisturizing is this product?" mainly indicate hydrating. Considering feedback for the long-wearing category the current rating of one indicates considering the question "how long-wearing is this product?" mostly responded disappears quickly. On the colour category a rating of four suggests reviewers evaluating "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" are mildy towards true to colour. Looking at review rankings for the pigmentation category an average of zero suggests users & critics when asked "how pigmented is this product?" primarily lean sheer.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipgloss is stickiness. stickiness ranges from very sticky to not sticky. Very sticky might be a desired quality for you, while not sticky might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for stickiness without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
potentially helpful related reviews
not for this shade
:
The Happy Sloths @ JasmineThese aren't as pigmented or long-lasting as I had hoped but the pillowy cushion applicator alone would have won me over! read the full review
not a review but perhaps helpful - here is a description from the source: What it is: This seriously addictive lip oil with a pillowy-soft cushion applicator gives your lips a delicious shot of color with a hint of shine. What it does: Its bi-phase technology delivers the first pigmented lip oil with two distinct phases. The first phase is a transparent oil for a comfortable, nonsticky shine; the second is a pigmented phase for a shot of color. Its cocktail of five nourishing oils treat your lips like a lip balm does. Peach kernel oil, a well-known emollient, softens lips; sweet almond oil conditions; apricot oil hydrates; cranberry oil provides rich antioxidant properties; and muscat rose oil, rich in essential fatty acids, soothes your lips. It delivers the perfect sheer tint of color each time you sweep it on. How to use: Shake it like a cocktail shaker up to five times to mix the pigment and oil together. Tap the cushion applicator onto your lips for a tint of color with a sheer finish. For a more pigmented look, build a base using a lip liner or matte lipstick then tap on Juicy Shaker. For a plumped lip look, tap onto the corners of your cupid's bow on the upper lip- 0.22 oz.
other popular suggestions: Color Design Lipstick 338 Seal The Deal Matte Shaker Liquid Lipstick 480 Rosemantic