Rôsy Plump L'Absolu Gloss
lip gloss, plumper, & stain
your collection looks empty, select have, wishlist, or had from anything on the site to get started:
everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about how long lasting this lipgloss, lip plumper or lip stain is? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for L’Absolu Gloss - Rôsy Plump by Lancôme. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
swatches for Lancôme Rôsy Plump
no swatches in sight,
provide the first applied swatch photo
Reviews for Lancôme L'Absolu Gloss Rôsy Plump
less then fifty reviews
| Formula Thickness - how thick is the formula for this product? |
| Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
| Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
| Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
| Pigmentation - how pigmented is this product? |
| Luster - how lustrous is this product? |
| Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
| Stickiness - how sticky is this product? |
| Feathering - how feathering is this product? |
| Texture - how is the texture of this product? |
| Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: On the formula thickness category the current rating of four indicates replies to "how thick is the formula for this product?" mildly suggest thick. Looking at review rankings for the moisturizing category the current four is a sign that evaluating "how moisturizing is this product?" generally favor hydrating. Considering the colour category an average total of five suggests responses to "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" mostly responded true to colour. Considering feedback for the pigmentation category the rating of four suggests reviewers considering the question "how pigmented is this product?" slightly indicate opaque. Reviewing the luster category an average of four suggests users & critics when asked "how lustrous is this product?" somewhat suggest glossy.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipgloss is stickiness. stickiness ranges from very sticky to not sticky. Very sticky might be a desired quality for you, while not sticky might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for stickiness without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
potentially helpful related reviews
not for this shade
:
Emilythe formula here is great, it's really comfortable, it's got just enough thickness, just enough cling to the lips, you're not gonna be wearing this gloss and like really thinking about it all day watch the full review
Sarah(talking about the velvet matte formula specifically) I just feel like this product doesn't know what it wants to be, it's not a lipstick, it's not a liquid lipstick, it's not a gloss, like it just doesn't fit into a category. watch the full review
JeanI find these to be super moisturizing, super comfortable, they are, for a lipgloss, they're long wearing. It's very rare that I see a lipgloss that's actually long wearing. watch the full review
not a review but perhaps helpful - here is a description from the source: What it is: A creamy yet nonsticky gloss. What it does: This vitamin-enriched formula will satisfy any makeup addict's desires. It's available in a wide range of shades with finishes from sheer with a buildable subtle shine, to cream with rich satiny color, to demi-matte with a comfortable dewy matte finish. Your lips look instantly refreshed, hydrated and plumped. Plus, the soft-tip high-precision applicator only necessitates one stroke to cover your lips. How to use: For fuller lips, use as a base and line your lips with a liner. You can wear it alone or with a lipstick- 0.27 oz- Winner of Allure magazine's 'Best of Beauty' Award for Best Lip Gloss, 2018
other popular suggestions: Color Design Lipstick 357 Wannabe Blush Subtil Delicate Oil-Free Powder Blush Shimmer Mocha Havana