303 Mirror Mauve LacquerInk LipShine
lip gloss, plumper, & stain
your collection looks empty, select have, wishlist, or had from anything on the site to get started:
everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about how long lasting this lipgloss, lip plumper or lip stain is? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for LacquerInk LipShine - 303 Mirror Mauve by Shiseido. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
no dupes in sight,
identify the first
swatches for Shiseido 303 Mirror Mauve
no swatches in sight,
provide the first applied swatch photo
Reviews for Shiseido LacquerInk LipShine 303 Mirror Mauve
less then fifty reviews
| Formula Thickness - how thick is the formula for this product? |
| Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
| Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
| Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
| Pigmentation - how pigmented is this product? |
| Luster - how lustrous is this product? |
| Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
| Stickiness - how sticky is this product? |
| Feathering - how feathering is this product? |
| Texture - how is the texture of this product? |
| Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews for this deep pink hued lip gloss, plumper, & stain so far: In the formula thickness category an average of two is a sign that when asked "how thick is the formula for this product?" mildly favor thin. Considering feedback for the moisturizing category a rating of four suggests responses to "how moisturizing is this product?" mostly responded hydrating. Feedback for the long-wearing category the current rating of one suggests users & critics replies to "how long-wearing is this product?" generally suggest disappears quickly. Looking at review rankings for the colour category the current five indicates evaluating "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" usually favor true to colour. On the pigmentation category the rating of five suggests reviewers in response to the "how pigmented is this product?" generally favor opaque.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipgloss is stickiness. stickiness ranges from very sticky to not sticky. Very sticky might be a desired quality for you, while not sticky might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for stickiness without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
potentially helpful related reviews
not for this shade
:
The Happy Sloths @ JasmineThe finished look is just stunning but both the application and maintenance are quite demanding so I would not recommend these for those looking for an easy, on-the-go lip product. read the full review
not a review but perhaps helpful - here is a description from the source: What it is: A featherweight lip shine where high-intensity pigment meets the luminosity of a gloss. What it does: Its unique blend of oils offer the same shine and comfort of a gloss while smoothing polymers provide the durable, hydrating color of a lipstick. A custom concave applicator hugs the contours of the mouth and dispenses the perfect amount of pigment that can be worn alone or layered over other lip products for extra dimension and sheen. This full-coverage fluid deposits inky color with a vivid, vinyl finish that won't leave lips dry or sticky. How to use: Swipe the applicator across lips and use the pointed tip to define the inner corners and bow of the mouth.
other popular suggestions:
Essentialist Eye Palette Namiki Street Nature
White Lucent Brightening Cleansing Foam
potentially related by color:
dark pink lip gloss, plumper, & stain
dark pink Shiseido lip gloss, plumper, & stain