everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about the best lip brush or lip primer for this lipstick, or if you apply it directly from the tube? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Matte Lipstick - Diva by MAC. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
Application - how did this product apply? |
Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
Pigmentation - how pigmented is this product? |
Luster - how lustrous is this product? |
Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
Feathering - how feathering is this product? |
Texture - how is the texture of this product? |
Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Looking at review rankings for the application category an average of four suggests users & critics when asked "how did this product apply?" usually suggest glides. On the moisturizing category a rating of two is a sign that responses to "how moisturizing is this product?" lean slightly drying. In the long-wearing category the current four suggests evaluating "how long-wearing is this product?" mainly suggest stays all day. Considering the colour category the rating of six suggests reviewers replies to "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" frequently suggest true to colour. Feedback for the pigmentation category an average total of six indicates considering the question "how pigmented is this product?" lean strongly towards opaque.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
Jackieit's super pigmented, no tug at all, and it's pretty soft which is what I like about it, and it makes your teeth look white watch the full review
Sarahnot as dry as the retro matte formula and I actually think this held up a little bit better than the retro matte. watch the full review