519 Fuchsia Fetish ModernMatte Powder Lipstick
lipstick
your collection looks empty, select have, wishlist, or had from anything on the site to get started:
everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about the best lip brush or lip primer for this lipstick, or if you apply it directly from the tube? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for ModernMatte Powder Lipstick - 519 Fuchsia Fetish by Shiseido. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
no dupes in sight,
identify the first
swatches for Shiseido 519 Fuchsia Fetish
no swatches in sight,
provide the first applied swatch photo
Reviews for Shiseido ModernMatte Powder Lipstick 519 Fuchsia Fetish
less then fifty reviews
| Application - how did this product apply? |
| Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
| Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
| Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
| Pigmentation - how pigmented is this product? |
| Luster - how lustrous is this product? |
| Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
| Feathering - how feathering is this product? |
| Texture - how is the texture of this product? |
| Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: In the application category an average of four is a sign that when asked "how did this product apply?" mainly favor glides. Reviewing the moisturizing category an average total of four indicates replies to "how moisturizing is this product?" usually suggest hydrating. Feedback for the long-wearing category the rating of two suggests reviewers evaluating "how long-wearing is this product?" are slightly towards disappears quickly. Looking at review rankings for the colour category the current six suggests users & critics responses to "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" lean strongly towards true to colour. Considering feedback for the pigmentation category a rating of five suggests in response to the "how pigmented is this product?" mostly responded opaque.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
potentially helpful related reviews
not for this shade
:
not a review but perhaps helpful - here is a description from the source: What it is: A weightless, full-coverage matte lipstick that lends lips long-lasting, velvety color. What it does: This nondrying formula provides a powder-soft finish on lips. A unique blend of waxes and oils melts and transforms into an ultra-thin, featherweight powder, while spherical pigments float across lips to blur imperfections. Available in shades inspired by Tokyo's nightlife, this statement-making lipstick provides eight hours of rich, velvety color. How to use: Glide the angular bullet across lips for extreme precision and control.
other popular suggestions: Kajal InkArtist Shadow, Liner, Brow 01 Tea House ColorGel Lip Balm 112 Tiger Lily