Sultry Move Powder Kiss Lipstick
lipstick
your collection looks empty, select have, wishlist, or had from anything on the site to get started:
everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about the best lip brush or lip primer for this lipstick, or if you apply it directly from the tube? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for Powder Kiss Lipstick - Sultry Move by MAC. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
no dupes in sight,
identify the first
swatches for MAC Sultry Move
no swatches in sight,
provide the first applied swatch photo
Reviews for MAC Powder Kiss Lipstick Sultry Move
less then fifty reviews
| Application - how did this product apply? |
| Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
| Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
| Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
| Pigmentation - how pigmented is this product? |
| Luster - how lustrous is this product? |
| Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
| Feathering - how feathering is this product? |
| Texture - how is the texture of this product? |
| Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews for this peachy pink hued lipstick so far: Feedback for the moisturizing category a rating of two suggests reviewers responses to "how moisturizing is this product?" are slightly towards drying. On the long-wearing category an average total of two suggests users & critics replies to "how long-wearing is this product?" somewhat suggest disappears quickly. Looking at review rankings for the colour category the rating of five suggests evaluating "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" usually suggest true to colour. In the pigmentation category an average of four indicates when asked "how pigmented is this product?" slightly favor opaque. Reviewing the luster category the current one is a sign that considering the question "how lustrous is this product?" generally favor matte.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
potentially helpful related reviews
not for this shade
:
Jessicait's such a thin formula but it feels like powder, but not like a dry powder, I've never tried anything like this watch the full review
Tasiawhen I'm applying this, it just feels like I'm putting on a lip balm, it's definitely weightless, doesn't feel like you're wearing lipstick at all watch the full review
Kelsee-Brianathese are just very sheer balmy type matte lipsticks. they feel lightweight on the lips watch the full review
Kelsee Briana Jaithis color is pretty opaque for the formulation...I like this color watch the full review
Amandavery lightweight, extremely comfortable, it doesn't even really feel like i'm wearing a matte lipstick watch the full review
not a review but perhaps helpful - here is a description from the source: What it is: A lipstick that totally reinvents matte. What it does: Delivering a romantic blur of soft-focus color, this weightless, moisture-matte lipstick was developed to replicate a backstage technique: blending out edges of matte lipstick for a hazy effect. Its groundbreaking formula contains moisture-coated powder pigments that condition and hydrate lips. The result is the zero-shine look of a matte lipstick with the cushiony, lightweight feel of a balm. How to use: Gently buff away dry and flaky skin for soft and smooth lips. For ultimate smoothness and moisture, prime the entire lip and lip edges. Apply the lipstick directly to lips to achieve an effortless blurred look.
other popular suggestions:
Plenty Of Pout Plumping Lipstick Nicer Than Nice
Love Me Lipstick Let Them Eat Cake!
potentially related by color:
dusty rose lipstick
dusty rose MAC lipstick