792 APHRODITE ROUGE COCO GLOSS Moisturizing Glossimer

Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Feedback for the formula thickness category the current two is a sign that responses to "how thick is the formula for this product?" are mildy towards thin. Considering feedback for the moisturizing category the current rating of four indicates considering the question "how moisturizing is this product?" generally indicate hydrating. Considering the colour category the rating of four suggests reviewers in response to the "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" mildly favor true to colour. On the pigmentation category an average of two suggests when asked "how pigmented is this product?" somewhat indicate sheer. Looking at review rankings for the luster category an average total of six suggests users & critics replies to "how lustrous is this product?" lean strongly towards glossy.

at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.

without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.

as an example, one rating criteria for lipgloss is stickiness. stickiness ranges from very sticky to not sticky. Very sticky might be a desired quality for you, while not sticky might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.

an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for stickiness without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.

we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .