your collection looks empty, select have, wishlist, or had from anything on the site to get started:
everything here is interactive: we set the defaults, you can change them. think a product has a different finish than the one shown? change it! want to track where you keep things ( location) or thoughts about how long lasting this lipgloss, lip plumper or lip stain is? write yourself a personal collection note, or tell the world in a review.
we’ve placed have / want / had icons everywhere you see a product, either on a picture, in a list (like on the brand or category pages), as well as at the top of individual product pages like this one for ROUGE COCO GLOSS Moisturizing Glossimer - 212 AURORA by CHANEL. add products to your makeup collection wherever you see these icons. once there, you can sort by category, have/want/have, or even build your own custom kits for further organizing.
no dupes in sight,
identify the first
swatches for CHANEL 212 AURORA
no swatches in sight,
provide the first applied swatch photo
Reviews for CHANEL ROUGE COCO GLOSS Moisturizing Glossimer 212 AURORA
less then fifty reviews
| Formula Thickness - how thick is the formula for this product? |
| Moisturizing - how moisturizing is this product? |
| Long-Wearing - how long-wearing is this product? |
| Colour - does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
| Pigmentation - how pigmented is this product? |
| Luster - how lustrous is this product? |
| Buildable - how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? |
| Stickiness - how sticky is this product? |
| Feathering - how feathering is this product? |
| Texture - how is the texture of this product? |
| Value - how would you rate the value of this product overall? |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Considering the formula thickness category a rating of two suggests responses to "how thick is the formula for this product?" are slightly towards thin. Considering feedback for the moisturizing category the rating of four suggests users & critics evaluating "how moisturizing is this product?" mainly suggest hydrating. Looking at review rankings for the colour category the current five suggests reviewers replies to "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" generally favor true to colour. Reviewing the luster category an average total of five is a sign that in response to the "how lustrous is this product?" mostly responded glossy. On the stickiness category the current rating of four indicates considering the question "how sticky is this product?" usually indicate not sticky.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipgloss is stickiness. stickiness ranges from very sticky to not sticky. Very sticky might be a desired quality for you, while not sticky might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for stickiness without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
potentially helpful related reviews
not for this shade
:
JillI feel like the formula is the absolute perfect middle ground between being overly sticky and kind of goop-ing up on your lips vs. being so emollient and having so much slip that is just slides right on off watch the full review
GirlBossBeautythis is an outstanding lip gloss, out - stand - ing lip gloss, like this is one of those glosses where it's the everything because it is very pigmented watch the full review
Haydeethey do feel very moisturizing, they're definitely not sticky, it feels very lightweight and I really like it. watch the full review
ROUGE COCO GLOSS in AURORA is a shimmering bright pink, non-sticky lipgloss that leaves your lips visibly smooth and plump, and brilliantly polished. The innovative, dual-sided applicator provides even coverage and high precision. The ultra-light formula is enriched with Coconut Oil, Peptides and Vitamin E, along with an exclusive Hydraboost Complex, to offer hours of comfort and moisture. This limited edition lip gloss was released with the Cruise 2019 Collection. How to Use: Use the curved side of the applicator tip on your bottom lip for even coverage and the rounded side on the top lip for precision. Mix shades together or layer over any Chanel lipstick to create a color customized for you.
other popular suggestions: JOUES CONTRASTE Powder Blush 350 - ROSEWOOD JOUES CONTRASTE Powder Blush 99 - ROSE PÉTALE